From SharePoint to Slack: Unstructured Data Readiness for Enterprise AI Search and Agents

Enterprise knowledge lives in places people, not systems, choose. That means PowerPoint decks on SharePoint, long project threads in Slack, policy PDFs on Box, meeting recordings in OneDrive, comments in Figma, terminal logs in Jira, and a thousand other nooks. For years, knowledge management promised harmony; in practice, teams optimized for speed and used whatever worked. Now that AI search and agents can finally make sense of unstructured information at scale, readiness isn’t about choosing a single system—it’s about meeting your data where it lives and making it safe, useful, and actionable.

This article breaks down the essential elements of unstructured data readiness for enterprise AI search and agents. Whether you’re piloting a Slack bot that answers HR questions or deploying a cross-repo engineering assistant, the same foundations apply: discoverability, security, governance, enrichment, retrieval, and feedback. With real-world examples and actionable guidance, you’ll learn how to convert messy content into reliable answers and trustworthy actions.

Why AI Search and Agents Need Unstructured Data to Behave

Large language models are capable of fluent responses but rely on up-to-date, trustworthy context to be useful inside enterprises. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) bridges the gap by injecting relevant passages from your content into the prompt. Enterprise agents go further: they reason over the retrieved context and trigger tools—creating a Jira ticket, dispatching a workflow in ServiceNow, or drafting a policy email for review. Without disciplined data readiness, the system answers with out-of-date or unauthorized content, or hallucinations fill the gaps.

The readiness challenge is twofold:

  • Heterogeneity: Files, messages, wiki pages, PDFs, code, diagrams, emails, transcripts; each requires different handling.
  • Control: Access rules vary by department, group, workspace, and sometimes per message. Agents must obey them in real time.

Mapping the Terrain: Where Unstructured Data Lives

Start with what your employees actually use. A typical inventory spans:

  • SharePoint and OneDrive: Policies, project docs, spreadsheets, and meeting recordings.
  • Slack (or Teams): Conversations, decisions, links to canonical docs, ephemeral context.
  • Confluence, Notion, or wikis: Handbooks, architecture guides, runbooks.
  • Box, Google Drive: Vendor contracts, legal PDFs, presentations.
  • Jira, GitHub, Azure DevOps: Tickets, code, PR discussions; semi-structured but text-heavy.
  • Email: Announcements, escalations, approvals; sensitive and mixed-signal.
  • Specialty systems: ServiceNow, Salesforce, PLM/PDM tools, LIMS/ELN in R&D, EHR notes in healthcare.

For AI search, you don’t always index everything. Readiness means prioritizing sources that matter to specific use cases, matching their security models, and ensuring data quality is good enough for retrieval.

Readiness Pillar 1: Discovery and Inventory

You can’t secure or improve what you can’t see. Build a machine-readable catalog of sources, scopes, and owners.

  • Enumerate tenants, workspaces, libraries, channels, and repositories. Capture object counts, last activity, and owner.
  • Tag each source with sensitivity level (public/internal/confidential/restricted) and region of data residency.
  • Classify content types: long-form docs, chat threads, images, audio, PDFs, logs.
  • Create a living “crawl contract” for each source: rate limits, API credentials, webhook availability, and incremental sync methods.

Example: A global manufacturer discovered 600+ SharePoint sites; 40% were stale, 15% had no listed owner. Starting with the 100 most-active sites and named owners reduced time-to-value by months and focused governance on high-impact areas.

Readiness Pillar 2: Access Control, Identity, and Consent

Enterprise AI must answer “Who is asking?” before “What is the answer?” Enforcement must mirror the source-of-truth permissions.

  • Single sign-on and SCIM: Provision users and groups centrally. Keep identities in sync to reflect job changes.
  • OAuth with resource-specific scopes: Connectors should request least-privilege scopes and respect tenant-level admin approval.
  • RBAC and ABAC parity: Inherit SharePoint ACLs, Slack channel membership, and Confluence space permissions; add attributes like region and project when available.
  • Row- and field-level filtering: Index time-limited links (e.g., Slack shared channels) with caution; hide redacted fields on retrieval.
  • Consent and legal hold: Exclude mailboxes under litigation hold; respect user-initiated content deletions and retention schedules.

Real-world issue: A bank piloting a helpdesk agent found that contractors had broader Slack access than intended. They instrumented a permission mirroring layer and added ABAC “employment_type=contractor” to restrict access to internal-only content. The agent’s response quality remained high while data leakage risk dropped markedly.

Readiness Pillar 3: Compliance and Governance by Design

Governance is not a bolt-on; it must shape ingestion and retrieval. Key levers include:

  • Sensitivity labeling: Use Microsoft Purview, Google labels, or custom tags; propagate labels into the index and retrieval filters.
  • PII/PHI detection and redaction: Run detectors during parsing; store redaction maps to allow authorized rehydration when needed.
  • Data residency and routing: Keep EU-origin data in-region; select embedding models available in-region; segregate vector stores per geography.
  • Retention and defensible deletion: Honor system-of-record retention policies; ensure deletes propagate to derived data (chunks, embeddings, caches).
  • Auditability: Log who queried what, which documents were retrieved, and whether an agent attempted an action; keep cryptographic hashes of source documents for integrity.

Healthcare example: A hospital’s clinical operations bot answered “How do we prep a patient for MRI with pacemaker?” The pipeline used PHI redaction on Confluence pages and applied a “clinical” label filter at retrieval time. Only staff with “clinical_role=true” could hit that index; patient-identifying details never left the secure enclave hosting the vector store.

Readiness Pillar 4: Content Extraction, Normalization, and Enrichment

The best AI search is won or lost at parsing time. Unstructured does not mean unparseable; it means you must impose structure consistently.

  • Extractors: Use OCR for scanned PDFs; speech-to-text for recordings; HTML-to-text with CSS-aware block grouping; preserve code fences and tables.
  • Normalization: Normalize Unicode, fix common PDF line breaks, resolve relative links, and canonicalize doc IDs across systems.
  • Structural markup: Identify headings, lists, captions, and footnotes; encode hierarchy (H1/H2) for hierarchical retrieval.
  • Metadata enrichment: Add author, team, system, created/updated timestamps, language, sensitivity label, and keywords. Generate summaries and embeddings-aware titles.
  • Ontology and entity linking: Recognize product names, internal acronyms, customer IDs; link to a knowledge graph for disambiguation.

Example: An engineering wiki used internal acronyms extensively. By adding an acronym dictionary and entity linker, retrieval improved dramatically; “SRR” became “System Requirements Review,” enabling the agent to retrieve the correct phase checklist rather than service request runbooks.

Chunking Strategy: From Pages to Passages

Chunks are the atomic units of retrieval for RAG. Too small and you lose context; too large and you waste tokens and increase leakage risk.

  • Structure-aware chunking: Split by headings and semantic boundaries, not arbitrary tokens. Keep tables intact.
  • Hierarchical windows: Maintain parent-child relationships so the model can escalate from a paragraph to the section summary when needed.
  • Query-aware re-chunking: For domains like troubleshooting, re-split with code blocks and logs preserved.
  • Time-sensitive chunks: Annotate with “freshness” scores (e.g., past 30 days) to bias retrieval toward updated content.

Retail example: A merchandizing team’s policies lived in 80-page guides. After structure-aware chunking and section-level summaries, search quality improved, and a pricing agent could answer “When can we mark down seasonal items in EU stores?” with the exact clause and citation.

Deduplication, Versioning, and Canonicalization

Duplicates fragment signals and create conflicting answers. Solve this early:

  • Cross-system fingerprints: Use content hashing to detect duplicates across SharePoint, Box, and email attachments.
  • Version graphs: Preserve lineage (PRD v3 links to v2 and v1); label canonical versions visible to search and agents.
  • Link graph enrichment: Elevate documents referenced by many sources; demote one-off uploads with low engagement.
  • Soft delete and tombstones: Mark removed documents so they disappear from retrieval but remain for audit windows.

Multilingual and Format Diversity

Enterprises produce content in multiple languages and modalities.

  • Multilingual embeddings: Choose models that represent languages in a shared vector space, or store language-specific embeddings with a routing layer.
  • Machine translation with caution: Either translate on query (low storage, higher latency) or pre-translate summaries (higher storage, fast retrieval).
  • Right-to-left and code-switching: Normalize punctuation and directional marks; keep language tags at chunk level.
  • Images and diagrams: OCR and diagram-to-text summaries; preserve callouts, legend labels, and axis names.

Automotive example: A German/Japanese R&D team uses bilingual docs. Multilingual embeddings plus short English abstracts let a U.S.-based agent surface relevant safety test procedures without lossy full-document translation.

Indexing for Hybrid Retrieval

Dense vectors shine at semantic retrieval; sparse methods (BM25) excel at exact terms, codes, and names. Hybrid retrieval is table stakes.

  • Maintain both vector and inverted indexes; fuse results with weighted blending.
  • Boost on metadata signals: Recency, author reputation, and canonical flags.
  • Personalization: Filter by team, project, or role; nudge toward a user’s recent workspaces.
  • Citation discipline: Always return document IDs and anchors so the UI or agent can show provenance.

For Slack: Index threads as units, not single messages, retaining thread context. For SharePoint: index by section within a page; keep table cells grouped by row and columns.

RAG Guardrails and Hallucination Controls

RAG improves factuality, but guardrails convert “better” into “trustworthy.”

  • Context binding: Instruct the model to answer only from retrieved passages; if none are relevant, say “no answer.”
  • Policy filters pre-generation: If retrieved content is restricted, block or redact before prompting.
  • Answer verification: Post-generation validation against citations; penalize ungrounded statements.
  • Time bounds: For time-sensitive queries, restrict retrieval to recent documents unless the user asks for history.

Real-world pattern: A sales enablement bot sometimes hallucinated competitor pricing. Adding an explicit “Only answer from documents tagged ‘approved-external’” constraint eliminated the issue and kept responses aligned with legal guidance.

Enterprise Agents: From Answers to Actions

Agents combine retrieval with tool use. Readiness now includes action policies and observability.

  • Tool registry: Define functions with schemas, auth scopes, and risk levels; e.g., “create_jira_ticket,” “reset_password,” “submit_procurement_request.”
  • Policy-as-code: Map actions to roles and conditions (“only for employee’s own account,” “requires ticket approval workflow”).
  • Review gates: For high-risk actions, require a human click-to-approve; store the retrieved citations with the action request.
  • Sandboxing: Use ephemeral credentials and per-action scoping; log every invocation.

Slack example: An IT assistant in Slack answers “How do I set up VPN on macOS?” with policy citations, then offers “Create a ticket if it still fails.” For eligible devices, it can trigger a mobile device management workflow—but only after the user confirms and the policy engine greenlights the action.

Use Case Playbook

IT Knowledge and Troubleshooting

Scope: Confluence runbooks, SharePoint SOPs, Slack #help-it threads, Jamf/Intune docs.

  • Extraction: Preserve commands and code blocks; normalize OS versions.
  • Retrieval: Hybrid search with recency boost; cluster duplicates from past incidents.
  • Agent actions: Create tickets, push MDM policies; gated by device ownership and group.
  • Metric: First contact resolution rate; time-to-answer under 10 seconds.

HR Policies and Employee Help

Scope: Handbooks, benefits summaries, regional variations, compliance training.

  • Enrichment: Label by region and employment type; embed glossaries for benefits terms.
  • Guardrails: Avoid personalized PII; provide links to the source policy page.
  • Agent actions: Pre-fill forms for leave requests; submit to Workday with manager approval.

Sales and Customer Success

Scope: Pricing guides, product one-pagers, case studies, competitor battlecards.

  • Freshness: Short TTL on sensitive pricing; nightly rebuilds.
  • Compliance: “External-safe” label required for any quote-related answer.
  • Agent actions: Draft customer follow-up emails with citations; log to CRM.

Engineering Knowledge and On-Call

Scope: Design docs, runbooks, code READMEs, incident retros, Slack war-room threads.

  • Chunking: Section-level for docs; thread-level for incidents; include runbook step IDs.
  • Agent actions: Fetch metrics, run safe read-only diagnostics; ticket creation.
  • Observability: Track hallucination rate during incidents; enforce “no answer” fallback if confidence low.

Data Pipeline Architecture: A Reference Blueprint

An effective architecture balances real-time needs with governance:

  1. Connectors and Event Sources
    • APIs for SharePoint, Slack, Confluence, Box; use webhooks where possible for delta updates.
    • Change Data Capture for systems that support it; schedule crawls only as fallback.
    • Throttling and backoff: Respect per-tenant rate limits to avoid being blocked.
  2. Extraction and Parsing
    • Content-type specific parsers; OCR pipelines; audio transcription with domain vocabulary.
    • Security-in-context: Decrypt where necessary within a secure enclave; minimize materialization of plaintext.
  3. Enrichment and Classification
    • Metadata normalization; entity recognition; sensitivity labeling; summaries.
    • Acronym expansion and KB linking.
  4. Indexing
    • Vector store per region or sensitivity tier; inverted index with document and field boosts.
    • Deduplication and canonicalization; track lineage to original source.
  5. Policy Enforcement Layer
    • Real-time access checks combining RBAC and ABAC.
    • Dynamic masking of sensitive fields; least privilege for agent tools.
  6. Query/RAG Gateway
    • Query understanding, spell correction, acronym expansion; hybrid retrieval fusion.
    • Grounded generation; citation verification; fallback strategies.
  7. Observability and Feedback
    • Coverage, freshness, permission errors, response quality metrics.
    • User feedback loop: thumbs-up/down with reasons; editorial curation workflows.

Security Model: Least Privilege, Always

Security readiness shows up everywhere:

  • Connector scopes: Separate read from write; if an agent needs to create tickets, keep that scope isolated from content ingestion credentials.
  • Data path minimization: Keep embeddings and caches encrypted; rotate keys; use private endpoints.
  • Runtime isolation: Separate tenant data by VPC or project; avoid cross-tenant indexing.
  • Admin controls: Allow opt-out per workspace; enforce allowlists for sensitive repositories.
  • Incident response: Build playbooks for permission drift, token leakage, and unintentional exposure in results.

Cost and Performance Management

AI search that scales requires cost discipline and latency awareness.

  • Embedding efficiency: Use domain-tuned embedding models; deduplicate and compress; avoid re-embedding unchanged chunks.
  • Caching: Cache retrieval results and model outputs with TTL; cache policy decisions for milliseconds-level checks.
  • Token budgets: Prefer grounded, concise contexts; use extractive summarization for verbose sections.
  • Tiered storage: Keep hot indexes (last 60–90 days) in fast stores; cold data in cheaper storage with on-demand indexing.
  • Latency targets: 300–700 ms retrieval budget for interactive experiences; defer heavy re-ranking to background.

Software company example: By switching to hierarchical chunking and caching per-user retrieval filters, the team cut monthly embedding costs by 40% and improved P95 latency by 30% without degrading answer quality.

Evaluation and Quality Assurance

Measure what matters to your users, not just offline retrieval metrics.

  • Golden sets: Curate questions with authoritative answers and citations; include tricky edge cases (acronyms, negations).
  • Offline metrics: Recall@k, MRR, nDCG for retrieval; groundedness and faithfulness for generation.
  • Online metrics: Time-to-first-answer, user satisfaction, escalation rate to human, click-through on citations.
  • A/B testing: Compare chunking strategies, ranking weights, or models; throttle by cohort.
  • Human-in-the-loop: Let domain owners pin canonical documents and flag problematic results for rapid remediation.

Operational Excellence: Observability and Drift

As content changes, indexes drift. Watch for:

  • Coverage gaps: Percentage of sources successfully indexed; error budgets per connector.
  • Staleness: Weighted recency scores; alert when critical sources exceed freshness thresholds.
  • Embedding drift: Monitor distribution shifts when changing models; run backfill jobs with canaries.
  • Policy miss hits: Incidents where retrieval returned content later blocked by policy; root cause and fix.
  • Agent misfires: Tool invocation failure rates; top failed actions by scope; mean time to rollback.

Change Management and Content Hygiene

No amount of modeling compensates for chaotic behavior patterns. Nudge culture and processes.

  • Channel naming conventions in Slack: #proj-foo, #help-it, #announce-all; make threads the default for decisions.
  • Pin canonical docs; discourage uploading outdated attachments into chats; prefer links.
  • Ownership: Every SharePoint site and Confluence space needs an owner; quarterly content reviews to archive or update.
  • Templates: Publish standard templates for PRDs, runbooks, and FAQs to stabilize structure for chunking.
  • Training: Teach employees to use citations and validate answers; “If you can’t cite it, don’t act on it.”

Public sector example: A city IT department launched a “Link, don’t attach” campaign and reduced duplicate PDFs by 60% in six months, improving search precision and cutting storage costs.

Slack-Specific Considerations

Slack is conversational, noisy, and rich with tribal knowledge. Getting it right pays dividends.

  • Scope selection: Start with public channels and curated private channels (with admin and owner consent).
  • Thread grouping: Treat a thread as a document with context; summarize long threads to reduce retrieval token budgets.
  • Relevance signals: Prioritize messages with reactions, stars, and bookmarks; downrank bot chatter.
  • Ephemeral content: Exclude ephemeral messages by design; handle deleted messages and edits via event subscriptions.
  • Privacy: Honor shared channels’ external visibility; never leak cross-org messages to the wrong audience.

SharePoint-Specific Considerations

SharePoint is hierarchical and policy-heavy.

  • Site and library mapping: Capture inheritance rules; resolve broken permission inheritance explicitly.
  • Document sets and versions: Index the latest major versions by default; provide a “view other versions” affordance.
  • Office formats: Extract track changes and comments carefully; exclude draft comments from retrieval unless permitted.
  • Meeting artifacts: For recordings, use diarization and agenda-aware summaries; link to meeting notes and transcripts.

Knowledge Graphs and Taxonomies

RAG performs better when grounded in shared vocabulary.

  • Taxonomy seeding: Product lines, regions, departments; map to tags in each source system.
  • Entity resolution: Customers appear as “ACME,” “Acme Inc.,” or “ACME-Global”; resolve to a canonical entity ID.
  • Graph-enhanced retrieval: Boost documents connected to the entity graph; personalize by the user’s entity neighborhood.
  • Drift control: Periodically reconcile terms; detect new acronyms and propose dictionary updates.

B2B SaaS example: A support agent answering “Any outages for OmegaCo?” uses entity resolution to find incidents tagged with the correct account, not generic mentions of “omega.”

Privacy by Default

Trust is the precondition for adoption.

  • Explainability: Every answer shows citations; a “Why am I seeing this?” control explains access.
  • User controls: Allow opt-out of personal mailbox indexing; show data usage logs to end users.
  • Edge prompts: Never store raw user prompts containing sensitive data longer than necessary; redact and aggregate analytics.
  • Model boundaries: Keep proprietary data out of provider training unless an explicit enterprise contract states otherwise.

Latency, Reliability, and the Human Experience

Fast answers win hearts; reliable answers win budgets. Make performance tangible:

  • Progressive disclosure: Show top citations first; stream generation once grounding is ready.
  • Offline prep: Precompute summaries for top-viewed docs; warm caches for recurring queries (payroll, VPN).
  • Graceful degradation: If vector store is down, fall back to BM25 plus curated FAQs; clearly label reduced quality.
  • Resilience: Circuit breakers for tool calls; retries with jitter; idempotency for agent actions.

Vendor and Build Decisions

Most enterprises blend build and buy.

  • Connectors: Commercial connectors accelerate breadth; validate security, permission fidelity, and webhook support.
  • Vector DBs: Choose for security features, regional replication, hybrid search, and TCO; test with your chunk sizes and QPS.
  • Models: Balance accuracy, latency, cost, and region availability; consider smaller models with better grounding for routine Q&A.
  • Open vs closed: Open models improve control; closed models reduce ops burden. Many teams use closed models with private routing and safeguards.

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

  • Indexing everything: Start with the top 10 sources that answer 80% of queries.
  • Ignoring permissions: “Demo-only” patterns leak in production. Build permission mirroring first.
  • Overchunking: Tiny chunks look precise but confuse the model; respect structure.
  • Static indexes: Without delta updates, answers age quickly. Use webhooks and incremental sync.
  • One-size prompts: Tailor prompt templates by domain; include policy reminders and time constraints.

Measuring Business Impact

Translate technical gains into outcomes leaders understand.

  • Support: Deflection rate from human agents; cost per contact.
  • Engineering: Time-to-onboard, mean time to resolve incidents.
  • Sales: Time-to-first-response, quota attainment tied to content usage.
  • Risk: Reduction in unauthorized access events; audit findings remediated.
  • Employee experience: eNPS movement correlated with faster, more accurate help.

Real-World Case Studies

Global Manufacturer: From Scattered SOPs to Shop-Floor Assistance

Problem: Safety and maintenance procedures lived in SharePoint, while troubleshooting tips lived in Slack. Technicians often asked peers, bypassing official SOPs.

Approach: The team built connectors for SharePoint and Slack with a focus on four plants. They performed OCR on scanned PDFs, enriched metadata with machine IDs and safety categories, and deduplicated outdated SOP copies. Chunking preserved step numbers and warnings. A safety label was required for retrieval. The agent in Microsoft Teams answered questions and offered to open a maintenance ticket with citations.

Outcome: Average time to find the right SOP dropped from 7 minutes to under 30 seconds. Safety compliance audits improved because answers linked to canonical, approved documents. Ticket quality improved with structured context attached by the agent.

Financial Services: Policy Assistant Under Regulatory Scrutiny

Problem: Employees asked nuanced policy questions in Slack; answers were inconsistent and sometimes noncompliant.

Approach: A RAG system indexed labeled policy docs in SharePoint and Confluence. The agent answered from “approved-internal” and “approved-external” corpora, never from Slack itself. Every answer included citations and a confidence band; sensitive answers required a compliance review gate for complex decisions.

Outcome: Variance in policy answers dropped dramatically. The compliance team used feedback analytics to identify “policy hot spots” and updated ambiguous sections first, reducing risk and improving clarity.

Healthcare Network: Clinical Operations Bot

Problem: Nurses needed quick access to procedures and medication guidelines across multiple hospitals and EHR-linked repositories.

Approach: Region-specific indexes respected data residency; PHI detection and redaction ran pre-indexing. Multilingual summaries supported diverse staff. The bot ran on secure devices with SSO.

Outcome: Response time for common procedures fell from minutes to seconds. Satisfaction scores rose, and audits confirmed no PHI leakage in logs or prompts.

Governance Workflows That Scale

Treat governance like product operations:

  • Content steward program: Each department nominates stewards who manage labels, canonicalization, and curation.
  • Review queues: When users flag a bad answer, route to the right steward with the retrieved documents attached.
  • Policy-as-data: Store guardrails in versioned configuration; test changes in staging with golden sets.
  • Lifecycle automation: When a doc is archived, propagate tombstones; remove stale chunks and invalidate caches.

Designing Prompts and UX for Trust

Prompt engineering should reflect enterprise norms and risk appetite.

  • Grounding instructions: “Answer only from citations; if unsure, say you don’t know.”
  • Persona and scope: “You are the HR policy assistant for EMEA employees; reference only EMEA-labeled documents.”
  • Response format: Provide an extractive answer, citations, and a short “How to act” section when safe.
  • Error handling: Clearly communicate when content is unavailable due to permissions or staleness; suggest requesting access.

UX details matter: Quick actions (“Open doc,” “Create ticket,” “Ask expert”) convert answers into outcomes while keeping humans in the loop.

A Pragmatic 90-Day Plan

Days 1–30: Foundation and Focus

  • Pick two use cases with clear owners (e.g., IT help and HR policies).
  • Inventory top sources: specific SharePoint sites, Confluence spaces, and 10–20 Slack channels.
  • Stand up secure connectors with least privilege; validate permission mirroring with test users.
  • Implement extraction and structure-aware chunking; add minimal metadata (owner, updated_at, sensitivity, language).
  • Build a hybrid retrieval index and a simple RAG gateway with citations.
  • Create a golden set of 100 queries per use case, including edge cases and regional variants.

Days 31–60: Guardrails and Quality

  • Integrate labeling and policy filters; deploy PII detection and redaction.
  • Tune chunking and ranking; add acronym expansion and entity linking for one domain.
  • Instrument observability: coverage, freshness, permission errors, retrieval metrics, groundedness.
  • Pilot with 100–300 users; collect explicit feedback and open comments on bad answers.
  • Introduce lightweight agent actions for low-risk workflows (ticket creation).

Days 61–90: Scale and Hardening

  • Expand sources gradually; onboard stewards; formalize curation workflows.
  • Regionalize indexes for data residency; set up canaries for embedding model updates.
  • Add advanced actions with policy gates; implement human approval flows.
  • Optimize cost: cache hot queries, reduce re-embedding, and create a cold-tier index.
  • Run A/B tests on ranking and prompting; publish a trust dashboard with key metrics.

After 90 days, you’ll have a working foundation: reliable connectors, grounded answers with citations, policy enforcement, and a small set of safe actions that measurably improve employee workflows. From there, iterate source-by-source and team-by-team, letting user demand and governance readiness determine the next expansions.

Comments are closed.

 
AI
Petronella AI