Azure Penetration Testing
Find What Microsoft Defender Misses.
Microsoft Azure hosts mission-critical workloads for organizations across every industry, but cloud adoption creates attack surfaces that traditional security tools were not designed to find. Misconfigured storage accounts, overprivileged service principals, insecure serverless functions, and Entra ID misconfigurations create attack paths that native Azure security tools routinely miss. Petronella Technology Group, Inc. delivers specialized Azure penetration testing that simulates real adversary techniques against your Azure environment.
23+ Years Cybersecurity • CMMC Registered Practitioner • 2,500+ Clients • OSCP Methodology
From Misconfiguration
Experience
Protected
Compliant Clients
Why Azure Environments Need Specialized Pen Testing
Azure's shared responsibility model means Microsoft secures the infrastructure, but your configurations, identities, data access patterns, and application code are your responsibility. Most Azure breaches exploit the gap between what organizations think is secured and what actually is.
Identity Is the New Perimeter
In Azure, identity compromises replace network intrusions as the primary attack vector. An attacker with a single compromised Entra ID credential can enumerate the entire tenant, escalate privileges through application consent grants, pivot across subscriptions, and exfiltrate data from storage accounts — all without triggering network-based detection. Traditional network pen testing does not test for these cloud-native attack paths.
Configuration Complexity
Azure has over 200 services, each with their own security configurations, IAM policies, networking options, and encryption settings. A single misconfigured storage account, an overprivileged managed identity, or a permissive network security group can provide the initial foothold an attacker needs to compromise your entire environment. Configuration drift over time introduces vulnerabilities that initial security hardening addressed.
Compliance Requirements
Organizations using Azure for regulated workloads — CMMC/DFARS defense contractors on GCC High, HIPAA-covered healthcare systems, PCI DSS payment processing, SOC 2-audited SaaS platforms — face specific penetration testing requirements. Generic vulnerability scans do not satisfy the offensive testing requirements that auditors and regulators expect to see in evidence packages.
Azure-Specific Penetration Testing Coverage
Our Azure pen testing methodology is built around the attack techniques that real adversaries use against Azure environments, mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK Cloud Matrix.
Entra ID (Azure AD) Exploitation
Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure Active Directory) is the authentication backbone of every Azure environment and the primary target for cloud-focused attackers. We test every stage of the identity attack chain — from initial access through privilege escalation to lateral movement across tenants.
Entra ID Attack Techniques We Test
- Password spray attacks — testing for weak passwords across the tenant while staying below lockout thresholds, using techniques that bypass Smart Lockout
- Token theft and replay — extracting and reusing OAuth tokens, refresh tokens, and Primary Refresh Tokens (PRT) to maintain persistent access
- Application consent abuse — exploiting OAuth consent flows to grant malicious applications access to user data, mailboxes, and Azure resources
- Conditional Access bypass — identifying gaps in Conditional Access policies that allow authentication from untrusted locations, unmanaged devices, or legacy protocols
- Privilege escalation through role assignments — testing for overprivileged users, excessive Global Admin accounts, and dangerous role combinations that enable vertical escalation
- Cross-tenant access exploitation — testing B2B collaboration settings, guest user permissions, and cross-tenant synchronization for unauthorized access paths
Azure Storage & Data Security
Azure Storage accounts are frequently the ultimate target of cloud attacks — they contain the data attackers want. Misconfigured storage access is one of the most common findings in Azure security assessments.
- Blob container enumeration — discovering publicly accessible containers, anonymous access misconfigurations, and overly permissive SAS tokens that expose sensitive data
- Storage account key exposure — testing for leaked access keys in code repositories, environment variables, application settings, and key vault references
- Shared Access Signature abuse — testing SAS token scope, expiration, IP restrictions, and whether overprivileged SAS tokens can be used to escalate access
- Data exfiltration testing — demonstrating whether an attacker with limited access can exfiltrate data from storage accounts, databases, or file shares through legitimate Azure APIs
- Encryption verification — confirming encryption at rest (customer-managed keys vs. platform-managed), encryption in transit enforcement, and key rotation policies
Serverless & Container Security
Azure Functions, Logic Apps, and container services (AKS, Container Instances) introduce attack surfaces that traditional infrastructure testing does not address.
- Azure Functions exploitation — testing for injection vulnerabilities in function inputs, overprivileged managed identities, environment variable exposure, and insecure function key management
- Logic App abuse — testing for insecure trigger URLs, connector credential exposure, workflow manipulation, and data leakage through integration connectors
- AKS cluster testing — Kubernetes-specific testing including RBAC bypass, pod escape, secret enumeration, container image vulnerabilities, and network policy enforcement
- Container escape testing — attempting to break out of containerized workloads to access the underlying host, adjacent containers, or the Kubernetes control plane
- API Management testing — testing API gateways for authentication bypass, rate limit evasion, subscription key exposure, and backend API direct access
Network Segmentation & Virtual Network Testing
Azure virtual networking provides segmentation capabilities, but misconfigured NSGs, overpermissive peering, and hybrid connectivity gaps create lateral movement opportunities.
- Network Security Group analysis — testing for overly permissive inbound/outbound rules, service tag misuse, and rules that allow broader access than intended
- VNet peering exploitation — testing whether peered networks provide unintended access paths between workloads that should be isolated
- ExpressRoute and VPN testing — assessing hybrid connectivity for routing leaks, split tunneling risks, and on-premises-to-cloud lateral movement paths
- Private Endpoint verification — confirming that PaaS services (Storage, SQL, Key Vault) are only accessible through private endpoints and not through public internet paths
- Azure Firewall and WAF bypass — testing web application firewall rules, Azure Firewall policies, and DDoS protection configurations for bypass techniques
GCC & GCC High Testing (CMMC / DFARS)
Defense contractors and government agencies using Azure Government (GCC/GCC High) face unique penetration testing requirements under CMMC and DFARS 252.204-7012. As a CMMC Registered Practitioner, Craig Petronella understands the specific controls that assessors evaluate.
- CMMC practice validation — testing the specific security controls required by CMMC Level 2, with findings mapped to the 110 NIST 800-171 practices that CMMC assessors evaluate
- CUI boundary testing — verifying that Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) is properly segmented, encrypted, and access-controlled within the GCC High environment
- Conditional Access and FIPS compliance — testing authentication controls, encryption requirements, and boundary protections specific to GCC High environments
- Cross-environment isolation — verifying that commercial Azure and GCC/GCC High environments are properly isolated with no data leakage paths or authentication crossover
- Audit logging verification — confirming that security events are properly logged, retained, and protected from tampering as required by NIST 800-171 AU controls
Need Azure Penetration Testing?
Get expert guidance from our team — 2,500+ businesses protected, zero breaches.
Talk to an Expert →Azure Pen Testing Methodology
Our methodology follows the MITRE ATT&CK Cloud Matrix and incorporates techniques from CRT (Certified Red Team), OSCP, and the Microsoft Threat Modeling framework.
External Reconnaissance
Enumerating your Azure footprint from an external attacker’s perspective: tenant identification, subdomain discovery, public blob storage enumeration, exposed API endpoints, leaked credentials in public repositories, and DNS record analysis that reveals Azure service configurations.
Initial Access Simulation
Attempting to gain initial access through password spraying, phishing simulation, token theft, application consent abuse, and exploitation of exposed management endpoints. We test the same techniques that real threat groups like Nobelium, Storm-0558, and Midnight Blizzard use against Azure environments.
Privilege Escalation & Lateral Movement
From initial access, we attempt to escalate privileges through Entra ID role exploitation, service principal abuse, managed identity hijacking, and Azure Resource Manager role assignments. We map lateral movement paths across subscriptions, resource groups, and connected on-premises environments.
Data Access & Exfiltration Testing
Demonstrating actual business impact by accessing sensitive data: reading storage blobs, querying databases, extracting Key Vault secrets, downloading file shares, and accessing mailbox data through Graph API. We prove whether your data protection controls actually prevent unauthorized access from a compromised account.
Azure Pen Testing for Compliance Requirements
Our Azure penetration testing satisfies offensive testing requirements across major compliance frameworks and produces audit-ready evidence documentation.
CMMC Level 2
Validating the 110 NIST 800-171 security practices for defense contractors on Azure GCC High. Our reports map findings directly to CMMC assessment criteria with evidence suitable for C3PAO assessors.
SOC 2 Type II
Demonstrating control effectiveness for SaaS platforms hosted on Azure. Pen test reports serve as evidence for Security and Availability Trust Service Criteria during SOC 2 audits.
HIPAA
Testing Azure-hosted healthcare workloads for ePHI exposure, access control effectiveness, encryption compliance, and audit logging adequacy required by the HIPAA Security Rule.
PCI DSS
Satisfying Requirement 11.3 annual penetration testing for Azure-hosted cardholder data environments. Testing network segmentation, access controls, and data protection around Azure services processing payment card data.
NIST CSF / 800-53
Validating security controls mapped to NIST Cybersecurity Framework functions and NIST 800-53 control families, including continuous monitoring, incident response, and access management effectiveness.
ISO 27001
Testing Azure infrastructure against Annex A controls, providing evidence for Statement of Applicability and supporting certification audits with offensive testing validation of control effectiveness.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Microsoft allow penetration testing on Azure?
How is Azure pen testing different from traditional network pen testing?
Will the pen test disrupt our production Azure environment?
Do you test Azure GCC and GCC High environments?
How long does an Azure penetration test take?
Find What Defender Missed in Your Azure Environment
Microsoft Defender, Sentinel, and Security Center are essential, but they are detective controls — they alert after something happens. Penetration testing is proactive: it finds the attack paths before adversaries exploit them. Get an Azure pen test from the cybersecurity team that has been testing critical systems for 23+ years.
CMMC-RP • OSCP Methodology • No disruption to production • Compliance-ready reports
Free Assessment
Get Your Cybersecurity Assessment
Find out where your business is vulnerable — in 30 minutes, no obligation. Our team has protected 2,500+ businesses since 2002.
No spam. Typically responds within 4 business hours.